臺北學研究主題資料庫

現在位置: 首頁 > 熱門推薦 > 熱門書目排行榜 > 詳細資料
  • 書籤
  • 建立標籤
  • 標籤連結
  • 推推
  • 詮釋資料
  • 影像
  • 目錄
系統識別碼 095NDMC0058006
資料類型 學位論文
主要題名 比較安全社區、準安全社區與一般社區民眾對安全的認知、態度與行為 - 以臺北市內湖區、中正區、南港區為例
作者 鍾其祥
出版日期 2007
頁碼或冊數 119
中文摘要 在2005年,台東豐濱(濱海型)、台中東勢(農村型)、嘉義阿里山(山地型)、以及臺北內湖(都會型)社區,都通過了世界衛生組織社區安全推廣協進中心的認證,成為全世界第91、92、93、94個安全社區。根據國外的研究指出,通過認證的安全社區居民對於安全的認知、態度與行為,與尚未通過認證社區民眾相比,有明顯地不同。台灣的安全社區與一般社區相較是否也能看出這樣的差異,值得進行瞭解。本研究以臺北市內湖區為安全社區代表,另選擇一個目前正積極準備要認證的準安全社區-中正區、及一個一般社區-南港區來比較這三個社區民眾對安全的認知、態度與行為有何不同。研究採用問卷調查的方式,在三個社區的行政中心,利用民眾洽公時發放問卷。回收的問卷包括內湖區222份、中正區213份、南港區235份,合計為670份,回收率74%。資料分析採用SPSS 14.0進行,以百分比、平均值、標準差等描述性統計,以及卡方檢定(Chi-square test)、皮爾森相關(Pearson Correlation)、多變項變異數分析(MANOVA)的推論性統計進行分析。
英文摘要 In 2005, the townships and districts of Fongbin, Hualian County (a littoral aboriginal community), Dungshr, Taichung County (a agriculture community), Alishan, Chiayi County (a mountainous community), and Neihu, Taipei City (a urban community) were designated by World Health Organization Collaborating Centre on Community Safety promotion, as the 91st-94th safe communities in the world. Overseas studies have shown that the safety knowledge, attitudes, and practice of residents from designated safe communities are significantly different from residents of undesignated communities. It is therefore of interest to see whether the same differences can be demonstrated between safe communities and control communities in Taiwan.The current study used three districts of Taipei City as an example of a safe community (Neihu District), a prospective safe community (Zhongzheng District), and a control community (Nangang District) in order to compare differences in the residents’ safety knowledge, attitudes, and practice within these three districts. The study was conducted using questionnaire surveys; the questionnaires were distributed to the residents of each district when they visited their district administration centers for civil services. Altogether 670 questionnaires were recovered, including 222 from the Neihu District, 213 form the Zhongzheng District, and 235 from the Nangang District. The response rate was 74%.Data analysis was performed using SPSS software 14.0, and analysis was performed using descriptive statistical methods (i.e., percentages, means, and standard deviations) and inferential statistical methods (i.e., the Chi-square test, Pearson correlation and multivariate analysis of variance [MANOVA]).
出版者 國防醫學院公共衛生學研究所
出版地 臺北市
備註 國防醫學院
關鍵詞 臺北市;內湖區;南港區;中正區;安全社區;安全認知;態度與行為
布農族的番丁的盛裝與旅行用裝

Google Map

Google Maps JavaScript API Example: LocalSearch Control

檢視較大的地圖