臺北學研究主題資料庫

現在位置: 首頁 > 熱門推薦 > 熱門書目排行榜 > 詳細資料
  • 書籤
  • 建立標籤
  • 標籤連結
  • 推推
  • 詮釋資料
  • 影像
  • 目錄
系統識別碼 087NTUST222003
資料類型 學位論文
主要題名 都市意象之研究-以臺北西門町為例
作者 潘榮傑
出版日期 1999
頁碼或冊數 128
中文摘要 當人們所處的生活環境從一個城鎮到另一個城鎮都相似的時候,實質環境已不再具有自明性(Identity),而使用者也失去了一種歸屬的認同感(Belonging)。因此,都市的意象及地區風格的發現,已經成為現今都市設計的重要課題。 本論文藉由認知圖繪(Cognitive Map)的調查方式,運用林區(Kevin Lynch)對於實質空間解析方法,以西門町地區為研究範圍,進行都市意象的操作與研究。其中更針對在西門町地區的活動族群(工作者、遊客、居住者)進行問卷調查分析,共計取得138份問卷,分別對於三種不同使用者所認知的意象元素進行歸納與探討。更進一步運用哈理森與霍華(James D.Harrison and William A.Howard)的意象理論,了解各族群使用者環境認知的屬性特質,進行分析與探討。根據研究獲得以下結論: 一、專業者與使用者認知西門町的意象有明顯差異 二、使用者認知意象元素特質: 以地標與通道元素指認度最高,最得到使用者一致的共同認知,節點與區域次之,而以邊緣為最弱,而「節點」與「地標」在受訪者的意象問卷中,較難有明顯的區隔,節點元素的認知是以西門圓環可意象性佔最高。另外,一般使用者所認知的西門町範圍,大致集中於西門主要商業區中。 三、各群體使用者環境認知的差異: 工作者傾向於以街道為主要組構環境的意象元素、遊客以地標為主要組構環境的主要對象、居住者則完整的呈現意象指認架構。 四、使用者環境意象的分類比較: 在西門町使用者問卷中,呈現出強烈的「點、線、面」之架構形成,運用認知圖描述環境現況的特性及其著重點,則可歸納為四:著重道路、、地點場所的描述、道路與地點、區域的描述。 五、以使用者的觀點出發,建立了西門町地區意象元素的分類方式(地點場所、邊緣、區域、道路)。 六、都市意象組成元素分類的適當性問題:作為理論核心所在的都市意象元素-通道、邊緣、地區、節點、地標,在實際分類應用上並不容易。 七、對於實質環境現況與使用者環境認知之比較與探討後,能夠提供專業者研究都市規劃之參考。 1.著重意象元素及地點的塑造,以視覺形式的強化與活動的舉行,更能強化地區的性格。 2.利用自然資源,歷史和有意義元素進行地方風格的形塑,創造獨特性進而產生自明性。 3.就視覺元素來說,一個地區可以藉由都市空間的配置座落、表徵、意義與聯想的元素,例如:識別、方位、指標、資訊、解說、管制、裝飾、街道家俱及設施來強化地區的自明性。 4.增進或強化主要通道的自明性,並維護或發展具有特色的地方性活動結點,與連繫各區域的連結共同建立具特色的區域。 希望藉由西門町都市意象的研究,以探討使用者環境認知特性和差異解析的成果,作為專業者規劃設計的參考,並能夠提供後續意象研究的建議與依據。
英文摘要 As the living environment of people becomes similar from one town to another one, the realistic environment has no more Identity, making the users lose a kind of Belonging. Therefore, the discovery of urban image and local style has become an important subject of the urban design nowadays. This thesis, through investigation method of Cognitive Map, by applying the substantial space analysis method of Kevit Lynch , focuses on Hsimenting area as the scope of research, to proceed urban image operation and research. Among which, it further progresses questionnaire investigation analysis concerning the activity groups (workers, tourists, inhabitants) of Hsimenting area, to obtain total 138 copies of questionnaire, respectively engaging in conclusion and discussion concerning the recognized image elements of 3 kinds of different users. Furthermore, the image theory of James D. Harrison and William A. Howard is employed, to understand the environmental recognition attribute characteristics of the users of each group, so as to perform analysis and study. According to the study, the following conclusions are obtained: I. Obvious differences exist between the recognized image of Hsimenting area by professionals and users II. Characteristics of the recognized image elements by users: The landmark and paths element recognition level is the highest, best in obtaining the users’ concurrent recognition; the next is nodes and district, while edges become the weakest. On the other hand, in the image questionnaires of the interviewees concerning “notes” and “landmark”, it is harder to produce obvious segregation. Among the recognition of nodes element, the imaginativeness of Hsimen circle accounts for the highest one. Besides, the scope of Hsimenting area scope recognized by general users normally is concentrated in the major commercial district of Hsimen. III. Differences of environmental recognition of users of various groups: Workers tend to focus on paths as major group environment image elements; tourists focus on landmark as major element to group environment; while inhabitants completely express the image identity structure. IV. Classification and comparison of users concerning environment image: In the users’ questionnaires of Hsimenting, strong framework formation of “point, line, facade” has formed. By applying recognition diagram to describe the characteristics of current status of environment and its emphases, it can be concluded into 4: concerned paths, description of location site, paths and locations, description of district. V. Starting from the point of view of users, the Hsimenting area image element classification manner is set up (locations, sites, edges, districts, paths). VI. Problem of appropriateness of urban image composition elements classification: Urban image elements for the location as the theoretical nucleus — paths, edges, districts, nodes, landmark, in practical classification application is not easy. VII. Through comparison and study of the current status of substantial environment and users’ environment recognition, it can be provided to the professionals as reference of urban planning. 1. Concern on image element and location creation, through visual form strengthening and activity holding, to reappear the district personality. 2. By using natural resources, historical and significant elements to perform local specification formation, create uniqueness so as to further produce identity. 3. In terms of visual elements, a district may, through urban space layout location, symbol, definition and connected elements, such as: identification, orientation, index, information, explanation, control, decoration, path furniture and facility, strengthen the identity of the district. 4. Improve or strengthen the identity of major paths, maintain or develop local activity structure with characteristics, and connect the link of each district to jointly build a district with characteristics. It is hoped, through the urban image study of Hsimenting, to discus the users environment recognition characteristics and difference analysis result, to serve as reference of professionals in planning design, and can provide follow-up image study recommendations and references.
出版者 立臺灣科技大學工程技術研究所建築設計學程
出版地 臺北市
關鍵詞 臺北市;萬華區;西門町;都市意義;認知圖;環境心理
布農族的番丁的盛裝與旅行用裝

Google Map

Google Maps JavaScript API Example: LocalSearch Control

檢視較大的地圖